Legal Opinion

Sessmer v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 24, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

After an investigation by tbe local Bar Association, the Commonwealth’s attorney, in the name of the Commonwealth, filed a petition and information in the Jefferson circuit court against David Sessmer, G-ordon R. Kinsey, Thomas P. Heyser, and William Davidson, practicing attorneys at that bar, charging them with unethical and unprofessional conduct and improper practices. A rule was asked to issue against the defendants to show cause why they should not be disbarred and their names stricken from the rolls.

The substance of the allegations…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Morse v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Jenkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Chreste v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Lenihan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re GilbertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Sessmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Adkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. National Council of the Knights & Ladies of Security v. RowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Vincent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API