Legal Opinion

Lund v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided May 23, 2012No. 06-11-00201-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice CARTER.

After a jury trial, James Edmond Lund was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon 1 and sentenced to five years’ incarceration. 2 On appeal, Lund complains of the admission of a witness statement, in violation of the Texas Rules of Evidence. Although we find (1) it was proper to use the statement for impeachment, (2) the trial court erred by failing to submit a timely and proper limiting instruction relative to the statement, and (3) the trial court erred by admitting the witness statement for all purposes, such error did not result in harm. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Christopher Dewayne Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
  2. Christopher Neal McGonigal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Donald Hall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  4. James Russell Faglie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
  5. Joseph Kevin Villyard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API