Legal Opinion

Chase National Bank v. Hastings

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1898No. 3066PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. William: Hickman Moore, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

In August, 1892, John L. Austin executed ■and delivered to J. K. Edmiston two promissory notes, one for $4,000, and one for $8,000, due in six months and in ■one year, respectively, and at the same time executed to Edmiston a mortgage upon certain real property to secure “the payment of the notes. Within a month thereafter, Austin, the mortgagor, conveyed the mortgaged premises by warranty deed to Edmiston, the mortgagee, in which deed Edmiston assumed and agreed to pay the mortgage indebtedness, and at the time of taking this deed Edmiston…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Overholser v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Lyman v. GedneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Lockwood v. SturdevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
  4. Gardner v. AstorNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  5. Jordon v. CheneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hilmes v. MoonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Summy v. RamseyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Beecher v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Anderson v. StarrWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Connecticut Investment Co. v. DemickWashington Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API