Allman v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ELDER, Judge.
Brian P. Allman (appellant) appeals from his bench trial conviction for making an obscene telephone call with an intent to coerce, intimidate or harass in violation of Code § 18.2-427. On appeal, he contends the evidence was insufficient to prove his language was obscene or that he acted with the requisite intent. 1 We hold the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, was insufficient to prove his language was obscene. Thus, we reverse and dismiss his conviction without considering whether he acted with an intent to harass.
I
BACKGROUND
At the time of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rives v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Barson v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Barson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Lofgren v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Richard Turner Moter v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.