Piesneski v. Stepien
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiffs and defendants entered into a contract for the exchange of certain pieces of real estate owned by them respectively. Within the period of six months fixed in the contract for the consummation of the exchange, defendants refused to fulfill their obligation. Plaintiffs filed a bill in equity praying for specific performance, to which defendants filed an answer setting up certain defenses. The trial of the issues raised by these pleadings resulted in a formal adjudication, containing findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a decree of specific performance against…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Berlin Smokeless Coal & Clay Co. v. RohmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rambo Building & Loan Ass'n v. DragoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Duc v. Struckus Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Severance v. Heyl & PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Arlia v. Philadelphia Transportation Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1950