Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of McNeil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, P. J.

One of the main problems in this will construction proceeding is whether the words “ children ” and “ nephews and nieces ” used in testator’s will included the children of deceased children and children of deceased nephews and nieces. The Surrogate held they did not.

Paragraph Fifth of the will provides: “ Fifth. All of the remainder of my property shall be divided by my executor into a number of shares equal to the number of brothers or sisters surviving me and the number of deceased brothers or sisters who have left children surviving them and I give, devise and bequeath the said remainder…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scott v. . GuernseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Matter of Estate of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Prowitt v. . RodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. In Re the Accounting of MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of PatonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CampbellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Newmont Mines Limited and Esso Resources Canada Limited v. Hanover Insurance Company & Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Newmont Mines Limited and Esso Resources Canada Limited v. Hanover Insurance Company & Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API