In re the Estate of McNeil
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, P. J.
One of the main problems in this will construction proceeding is whether the words “ children ” and “ nephews and nieces ” used in testator’s will included the children of deceased children and children of deceased nephews and nieces. The Surrogate held they did not.
Paragraph Fifth of the will provides: “ Fifth. All of the remainder of my property shall be divided by my executor into a number of shares equal to the number of brothers or sisters surviving me and the number of deceased brothers or sisters who have left children surviving them and I give, devise and bequeath the said remainder…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scott v. . GuernseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Matter of Estate of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Prowitt v. . RodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- In Re the Accounting of MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of PatonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. CampbellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Newmont Mines Limited and Esso Resources Canada Limited v. Hanover Insurance Company & Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Newmont Mines Limited and Esso Resources Canada Limited v. Hanover Insurance Company & Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986