Legal Opinion
United States v. Kodzis
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 28, 2003No. CIV. 03CR0275HAJBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Defendant Kodzis’ Ex Parte Application to File Proffer Under Seal
BATTAGLIA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Piotr Kodzis, through counsel, submitted an ex parte request to file a proffer under seal with regard to his eligibility for appointment of counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a). The government has filed an opposition, and Kodzis has filed a reply. Kodzis argues that he should be permitted to submit financial information by way of proffer made by his counsel, ex parte and under seal, in lieu of any personal statement on his own behalf. Kodzis argues this procedure is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kipperman v. Circle Trust F.B.O. (In Re Grafton Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. LexinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006