Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. Thurston State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1931No. 27788PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

This is an appeal by the receiver of Thurston State Bank from a decree ordering the United States to be paid a first preferred claim, and Johnsen and Krusemark to be paid a second preferred claim, subject only to that of the United States, out of the assets of the bank.

On January 12, 1928, the department of trade and commerce of the state took charge of the bank. The next day it placed it under the dominion of the guaranty fund commission. The commission handled its affairs until April 6, 1929, when a receiver was duly appointed by the district court for Thurston county. When the bank was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Guaranty Fund Commission v. TeichmeierNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State ex rel. Davis v. Kilgore State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Wells v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Thurston State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. In re Estate of FacklerTuscarawas County Probate Court · 1943
  5. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Horace State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API