Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Peters, Writer & Christensen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 8, 1960No. 18450PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

These parties appeared in inverse order in the trial court and are hereinafter referred to as there, or by name. Two separate cases involving the same transaction were involved in suits brought by plaintiff to recover on an account for the purchase of uranium stock. Issue was joined. The two cases were consolidated for trial -below, resulting in separate judgments against each of the defendants in the sum of $1,000.00. Defendants present the matter here on a single writ of error.

Plaintiff claimed to have received two separate orders for 50,000 shares each of Acme Uranium Company stock through…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salomon v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  2. Hall v. GehrkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cecka v. Beckman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Townsend v. Daniel, Mann, Johnson & MendenhallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. B. C. Christopher & Co. v. DankerNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Herron Northwest, Inc. v. DanskinWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Galusha v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API