Legal Opinion

Fair v. Warden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 6, 1989No. 13489PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the petitioner has established that his conviction of the crime of first degree robbery should be overturned because of ineffective assistance of counsel. A jury found the petitioner, Harvey K. Fair, guilty of first degree robbery, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-8 and 53a-134 (a) (3),1 and of escape from cus*400tody, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-171.* 2 The trial court imposed on the petitioner an effective sentence of twenty years imprisonment, suspended after fifteen years and three years probation. He then brought a petition in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Burger v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Ostolaza v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Safford v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Knock v. KnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API