Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 12, 2017No. 4D15-551PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EN BANC

Conner, J.

The defendant appeals an order denying his second motion for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He challenges his thirty-year sentence for DUI manslaughter on count one, arguing the sentence is illegal because it exceeds both the statutory maximum of. fifteen years and the lowest permissible sentence of twenty-two years under the Criminal Punishment Code. We affirm for two reasons: (I) relief is barred by collateral es-toppel; and (2) although the sentence is illegal, there is no manifest injustice to warrant an exception to the collateral es-toppel bar.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Wilhelm v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Buchanan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Champagne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. ANTHONY MCMILLAN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Benny Martinez C v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  4. Champagne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. NATHAN S. THORNTON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API