Legal Opinion

Stalcup v. Orthotic & Prosthetic Lab, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1999No. 74525PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHODES RUSSELL, Judge.

Orthotic & Prosthetic Lab, Inc. (“Lab”), appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict awarding James Stalcup (“plaintiff’) compensatory damages for his injuries as a result of Lab’s negligence in fitting him for a prosthetic leg. Lab maintains 1) plaintiff failed to make a submissible case of negligence; 2) plaintiffs verdict-directing instruction granted the jury a roving commission; 3) plaintiffs negligence claim against Lab was barred by the two-year statute of limitations in section 516.105 RSMo 1994 1 for actions against health care providers; and 4) plaintiffs damages…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Lemay Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Grindstaff v. TygettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Columbia Athletic Club v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. Smith v. KovacMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Cline v. William H. Friedman & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Carter v. St. John's Regional Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Boggs Ex Rel. Boggs v. LayMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Twin Chimneys Homeowners Ass'n v. J.E. Jones Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Williams v. DausMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API