Legal Opinion

Hodor v. GTE Mobilnet, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 31, 2000No. A00A1270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Senior Appellate Judge.

While employed with defendant GTE Mobilnet, Inc. (“GTE”), Brenda E. Hodor claimed that her supervisor, defendant Susan Bear, expressed insensitive remarks and otherwise engaged in conduct which caused plaintiff extreme emotional distress. Summary judgment was granted to the defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Held:

Summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 is appropriate in cases in which there are no genuine issues of material fact and the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Viewi…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Kornegay v. MundyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Peoples v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Frank v. FLEET FINANCE, INC. OF GEORGIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Desmond v. Troncalli MitsubishiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Board of Regents of the University System of GeorgiaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000
  2. Cook v. Covington Credit of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Lockhart v. Marine Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API