Legal Opinion

Smith v. Johe

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1957No. Civ. 17516PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgment for defendants entered upon the verdict of a jury. Plaintiff-appellant walked across the intersection of Union and Leavenworth Streets in San Francisco at about 9 :30 p. m. Respondent Johe drove an automobile owned by his employer uphill along Union Street and started a left turn into Leavenworth. There the car struck appellant.

Appellant first argues that the verdict is without support in the evidence. But there was a conflict in the evidence as to whether appellant was within or without the unmarked crosswalk. It is unnecessary to cite authority for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Staggs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Howard v. WorthingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Givens v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Fuller v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Warren v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. McShane v. CleaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API