Bird v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
In this case, the indictment charged, in substance, that the appellant, James Bird, and one Albert J. Ross, at Hancock county, on the 19th day of March, 1885, being the owners and having the management and control of a certain pool-table, did then and there unlawfully allow, suffer and permit one Harlan Haskell, a minor, to play pool upon such table with Henry Buoy, Morton Davidson and James L. Vail, contrary to the form of the statute, etc.
Upon the arraignment of the defendants and their plea of not guilty, the issues joined were tried by a jury, and a verdict was returned finding the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Ihinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Robinius v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Swigart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Watson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- First National Bank v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Watson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957