Legal Opinion

United States v. Blank

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 29, 1966No. CR 65-372PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNELL, Chief Judge.

On October 8, 1965, agents of the Internal Revenue Service descended upon the movant’s apartment to execute a search warrant for his premises. For the obvious reason that the conduct of the search transgressed the Fourth Amendment rights of the movant (a point presently conceded by the Government), we granted his Motion to Suppress Evidence on March 4th, 1966. Subsequently, on or about April 18th, 1966, the movant was hailed down to the local offices of the Internal Revenue Service where he was informed that a sizeable assessment was about to be levied against him. He was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Suarez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  3. Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
  5. Jacque Tirado, A/K/A Jacque Dante v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API