Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Shaw

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 23, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] Phyllis M. Shaw appeals from a divorce judgment entered in the District Court (Caribou, Daigle, J.). She contends that the court abused its discretion by (1) ordering a distribution of the marital residence and mortgage debt that was contrary to the parties’ agreement, without affording the parties an opportunity for an evidentiary hearing on the issue; and (2) relying on its distribution of the marital residence as justification for denying Phyllis’s claim for spousal support. Because we agree with Phyllis’s first contention, we vacate the judgment, remand for further hearing, and do…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ten Voters of Biddeford v. City of BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Cloutier v. CloutierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bonville v. BonvilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  2. Lowd v. DimoulasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. State v. DiPietroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. Thorne v. LeaskSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. U.S. Bank National Association v. Thomas ManningSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API