Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Everett

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action at Law.

1Opinion of the CourtDick, J.

The defendants, in their answer, allege the facts that the plaintiffs, before the commencement of this action, had begun several actions for the same subject-matter before a justice of the peace of the state, which have been tried and been transferred by appeal to the state superior court, and are now pending for trial. Under the old system of pleading—derived from the common law—which formerly prevailed *219in this state, the pendency of a former action was pleaded in abatement to.a second action brought by the same parties in regard to the same subject-matter. Under our now Code system such a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  5. Ellis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Seeger v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Powell v. FlanaryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API