Stanley Lawrence Gruca v. Secretary of the Army
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
On this appeal ours is the difficult but limited task of reviewing a draft board’s finding that the appellant Gruca was not entitled to be classified as a conscientious objector. The difficulty we face is inherent in a process which attempts to distinguish between a sincere belief and one that is not truly held and which for its success must rely in large part on deductions drawn from a registrant’s words and demeanor. At the same time the range of our intervention in this process is narrowly limited to determining whether there was any basis in fact for the draft board’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Mulloy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Aguayo, Agustin v. Harvey, FrancisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Joel ZiskowskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Jonathan Lippman EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- United States v. James Adam WoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.