Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur Mittelstaedt and John Johnsen
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 10, 1994No. 1435, 1797, Dockets 93-1645, 93-1713PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Circuit Judge:
Defendant John Johnsen served as the consulting engineer for two Long Island communities, and abused his influence with local government on zoning and planning matters by engaging in real estate projects there, using partners to conceal his participation. Johnsen and one of his confederates, Arthur Mittelstaedt, appeal from their convictions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York for conspiracy to commit mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and for filing false income tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206. Johnsen also…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Edmund M. AutuoriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Armand P. D'AmAtoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.