Legal Opinion · Dissent

Furry v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 23, 1991No. 90-94Published

1DissentCarter, Justice

I dissent.

It is tempting to approve a procedure for rescinding the consequences of chemical test refusal where an officer’s reasonable belief that a person has been driving while under the influence of an intoxicant later proves to have been mistaken. However, the statutory scheme does not authorize such relief.

The issue in the present case is similar to the one presented in Benning v. Iowa Department of Transportation, 441 N.W.2d 372 (Iowa 1989). In that ease, the person whose license had been revoked under section 321J.9 for refusing to submit to a chemical test had obtained a privately…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. NeitzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Saunders v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Langfield v. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Benning v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API