Legal Opinion
Hunt v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 6, 1939No. 7276PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
Petitioner is domiciled in the District of Columbia, and on July 1, 1937, was the owner of certain intangible property, consisting of money, shares of stocks in his possession, and other shares of stocks in the possession of a broker. This controversy concerns only the latter item. The District of Columbia laws require that every resident shall file with the Assessor of the District a tax return as of July 1 of each year, containing a true statement of his personal property for the purpose of taxation. Tit. 20, D.C.Code 1929, Sec. 753, 757. Petitioner duly filed his return on the form and in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tumulty v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Anniston City Land Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- German Savings Bank v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Delta Land & Timber Co. v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Davidson v. Franklin Avenue Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Capital Properties, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- District of Columbia v. PlaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- National Rifle Ass'n of America v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers' Ass'n v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Markham v. FriedlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.