Thomas v. Indiana Oxygen Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court in this alleged employment discrimination action is Defendant Indiana Oxygen Company, Inc.’s (“Indiana Oxygen”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint- and/or Cap Plaintiff’s Damages Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Filing No. 9.] For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Indiana Oxygen’s motion.
I
STANDARD OF REVIEW
The purpose of a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) is to test the sufficiency of the complaint, not to decide the merits of the case. Rule…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Anthony Hill v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Samuel Stallings v. Hussmann Corporation Brian GroningerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barnes v. LollingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- BARBER v. ALLISON TRANSMISSION INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- SHOENTHAL v. CITY OF SEYMOURDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- Stewart v. GallagherDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
- Timothy Upchurch v. Indiana Department of Correction, et al.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026