Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Indiana Oxygen Co.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided July 15, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00476-JMS-DKLPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court in this alleged employment discrimination action is Defendant Indiana Oxygen Company, Inc.’s (“Indiana Oxygen”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint- and/or Cap Plaintiff’s Damages Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Filing No. 9.] For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Indiana Oxygen’s motion.

I

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The purpose of a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) is to test the sufficiency of the complaint, not to decide the merits of the case. Rule…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Anthony Hill v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Samuel Stallings v. Hussmann Corporation Brian GroningerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LollingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. BARBER v. ALLISON TRANSMISSION INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
  3. SHOENTHAL v. CITY OF SEYMOURDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
  4. Stewart v. GallagherDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  5. Timothy Upchurch v. Indiana Department of Correction, et al.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API