Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Vakey

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 8, 2003No. 04-03-00558-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

CATHERINE STONE, Justice.

The City of San Antonio appeals the trial court’s temporary injunction order that enjoins the City from deducting any amount of money from David Vakey’s paychecks for the purpose of recouping or reimbursing the City for workers’ compensation benefit payments made to Vakey. In three issues, the City contends the trial court abused its discretion in granting the temporary injunction because: (1) Vakey did not prove a probable right of recovery; (2) Vakey did not prove a probable, imminent, irreparable injury; and (3) the injunction changed the status…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. Surko Enterprises, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  4. San Miguel v. City of Windcrest, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re NewtonTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Pharaoh Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Ranchero Esperanza, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
  3. the City of San Antonio v. James Diehl, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  4. Auburn Investments, Inc. v. LYDA Swinerton Builders, Inc. and NSHE TX Gainsville, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  5. City of Houston v. Dahlia Soriano, Willie O. Thomas, Nicole Pelrean, and Carl Noon, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API