Legal Opinion
San Miguel v. City of Windcrest
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided January 24, 2001No. 04-00-00244-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
In this accelerated appeal, Jason and Lidia San Miguel appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order granting the City of Windcrest (“Windcrest”) temporary and mandatory injunctions. In five issues, the San Miguels claim the trial court erred in granting the injunctions. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
Jason and Lidia San Miguel operate, in their home, a business for the care of elderly individuals. Windcrest filed suit against the San Miguels, seeking temporary and mandatory injunctions prohibiting the San…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. v. City of WilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
- Interfirst Bank San Felipe, N.A. v. Paz Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Iranian Muslim Organization v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- 8100 NORTH FREEWAY LTD. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Cook v. Tom Brown MinistriesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Kalbfleisch v. Columbia Community Unit School District Unit No. 4Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Salazar v. Gallardo, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- City of San Antonio v. Vakey, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.