Legal Opinion
Schimmelpfennig v. Jungkind
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided February 22, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner—
Reversing.
The question in this case is whether the judgment setting aside a deed to a remainder interest in real estate upon the ground of fraud and deceit is .proper. Particularizing, the question is whether the grantor was ignorant of the character of her title and had she known the true status would have executed the conveyance.
The background and sequences are necessary to an understanding of the immediate transaction.
Otto Jungkind and his family for many years ran a grocery in Covington. About four years after the death of his first wife he…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lossie v. Central Trust Co. of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Fields v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Moore's Adm'r. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Chrisman v. QuickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Shaver v. WeddingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Skaggs v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Sloan v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Harned v. SmootCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Calveard v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Conley v. Coburn, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.