Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1998No. C024462PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORRISON, J.

Evidence Code section 1108 allows bad conduct evidence to be admitted to prove “predisposition” to commit sex crimes. (Further unspecified section references are to this code.) Recently we rejected a due process clause challenge to the statute, emphasizing “section 1108 has a safeguard against the use of uncharged sex offenses in cases where the admission of such evidence could result in a fundamentally unfair trial. Such evidence is still subject to exclusion under Evidence Code section 352. ... By subjecting evidence of uncharged sexual misconduct to the weighing process…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. People v. ZapienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. LoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. VillatoroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. BranchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API