Legal Opinion
Senderowitz v. Clark
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1947No. 377PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Chief Judge.
The complainants are manufacturers of men’s and boys’ underwear and shorts. From the inception of price control and throughout the period involved in this complaint sales of their commodity were subject to the General Maximum Price Regu*913lation.1 On August 1, 1944 they reported to the Office of Price Administration that pursuant to Section 1499.3(b) (1) of the GMPR they had computed the maximum prices of their men’s shorts style 259 to be $2.839 per dozen and style 467 to be $3.-1619 per dozen. On October 20, 1944 the Regional Administrator issued Order No. 112 pursuant to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Porter v. SenderowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Rabkin v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Collins v. FlemingEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- Lee v. FlemingEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by8 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. v. Laborers International Union of North AmericaTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1973
- United States v. McCrillisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Fast v. Di Salle, Director of Price StabilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1951
- George M. Bryne, D/B/A General Contractors v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
- Durfee & Canning, Inc. v. Soconyvacuum Oil Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.