Legal Opinion

In re Cooperman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 1993PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This proceeding presents the issue of the validity of "nonrefundable fee” and "minimum fee” retainer agreements. Although such agreements have traditionally been subject to great criticism, their legality has never been directly addressed by this Court. We now address this question, and in doing so, we find a distinction between "nonrefundable fee” agreements and "minimum fee” agreements. "Nonrefundable fee” agreements, by definition, allow an attorney to keep an advance payment irrespective of whether the services contemplated are rendered. By contrast, a "minimum fee”…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Jacobson v. SassowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Greenberg v. Jerome H. Remick & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matter of CoopermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AplandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Cohen v. Radio-Electronics Officers Union District 3Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. In re SatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Cohen v. Radio-Electronics OfficersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API