Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. De Moulin
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from 'Circuit 'Court, Fall River County; Hon. Walter G. Miser, Judge. Action by the Farmers’ Loan & Trust [Company against Ernest P. De M'oulin. From- judgment for plaintiff and an order 'denying a new trial, defendant appeals. (1) To point one of the opinion, Respondent cited: 6 Eftc.
Read the full summary
Appeal from 'Circuit 'Court, Fall River County; Hon. Walter G. Miser, Judge. Action by the Farmers’ Loan & Trust [Company against Ernest P. De M'oulin. From- judgment for plaintiff and an order 'denying a new trial, defendant appeals. (1) To point one of the opinion, Respondent cited: 6 Eftc. PI. & Pr. 359; Sogn v. Keotzle, 38 S. D. 99; Sohwitz v. Thomas, 38 S. D. 180; Piemen v. Minnehaha Co., 26 S. D. 462. (2) To point two, Appellant cited: Rev. Code 1919, Sec. 2762; McConnel v. Marguiles, 39 S. D. 563; Babcock v. Ormsby (S. D.), 100 N. W. 759; Ashe v. Beardsley (N. D.), 69 N. W. 188; Pape…
1Opinion of the Court
GATES, J.-
This is an action upon a promissory note. At the conclusion of the trial the court directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment and order denying new trial defendant appeals.
[1] It is first urged that the court erred in sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s counterclaim. The defendant, in-. *578stead of standing on said pleading, answered over. He thereby abandoned his right to further challenge the ruling complained of. Sogn v. Koetzle, 38 S. D. 99, 160 N. W. 520.
[2] Appellant next complains of the refusal of the court to suppress the depositions of Toy and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sogn v. KoetzleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Fountain City Drill Co. v. LindquistSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908