Legal Opinion

Hieb v. Mitchell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1990No. 18103PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

This case deals with statutory redemption rights and procedures to effectuate a statutory redemption and subsequent redemption. Plaintiff appellant (Hieb) purchased real property at a foreclosure sale. Defendant respondent (Mitchell) purchased a quitclaim deed from Farmers Home Administration (FHA) which held a mortgage on the subject real property. Mitchell then attempted to redeem on the property, based upon the quitclaim deed. Hieb then purchased a judgment from First Security Bank on the same real property and attempted a subsequent redemption from Mitchell. Hieb then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bateman v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. St. Benedict's Hospital v. County of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. McCallumIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Beckhart v. HTS Properties, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Capital Investment Corp. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. ClapierIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Frisby v. ClapierIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API