Legal Opinion

Pace v. Furdon

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 20, 1978No. Civ. A. No. 73-3494-CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAFFREY, Chief Judge.

This is a civil action brought pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1331, 1343. After a non-jury trial, I find and rule as follows:

Plaintiff Robert V. Pace is a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Defendants Paul E. Furdon and Lloyd Baylis are police officers employed by the Police Department of the Town of Lexington, Massachusetts. Plaintiff alleges that, acting under color of state law, defendants denied him his right to due process “guaranteed under the Fourth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
  2. Cleveland v. PalmbyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. The Marie LeonhardtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API