Tassian v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Chief Justice.
We granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals in Tassian v. People, 696 P.2d 825 (Colo.App.1984), which, in affirming a judgment of dismissal, held that a Denver District Court chief judge’s directive prohibiting pro se litigants from paying filing fees by personal checks did not violate equal protection of the laws under the Colorado Constitution. Because the chief judge’s directive lacks a rational basis for distinguishing between pro se litigants and litigants represented by attorneys, we conclude that it violates equal protection of the laws…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- HealthONE v. Rodriguez ex rel. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Kirk v. Denver Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Firelock Inc. v. District Court in & for the 20th Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Kinsey v. PreesonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.