Legal Opinion
Weising v. Fairfield Properties
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 5, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated February 7, 2003, as, in effect, denied that branch of their cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages for negligence.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, *428on the law, with costs, that branch of the cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages for negligence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Metling v. Punia & Marx, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Skates v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gwyn v. 575 Fifth Avenue AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Robertson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Berkowitz v. Long Island Water Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Sescila v. Great South Bay Estates Homeowner's Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- D'Andrea v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005