Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Rink's Department Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 2, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
These consolidated appeals involve two indictments against Rink’s Department Stores, Inc., and two against Ontario Store of Cincinnati, Ohio, Inc. One of the indictments against each defendant was for working on Sunday, and the other for employing others to work on Sunday, in alleged violation of KRS 436.160. The circuit court dismissed the indictments on the ground that the statute, in its exemption of “work of necessity,” was so vague, indefinite and uncertain as to be unenforceable. The Commonwealth has appealed. (160 additional indictments against Rink’s, and 122…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Heck's, Inc. v. GatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
- Charles Stores Company v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. SolomonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Knights of Columbus Council No. 3884 v. MulcahySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- State v. Target Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. Rink's Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970