Legal Opinion
Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Custer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 4, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and plaintiffs’ motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiffs, executors of the estate of William L. Doerflinger, appeal from an order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting defendant’s cross motion dismissing their complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations. The action is on a demand note dated July 9, 1974 made by defendant and given to William L. Doerflinger. In opposing defendant’s claim that the action was time barred, plaintiff asserted that the debt had been revived by a letter dated January 15, 1981 allegedly signed by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lincoln-Alliance Bank & Trust Co. v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- In Re the Estate of SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In re the Final Judicial Settlement of SteeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Marine Midland Bank v. BryceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Krugman v. Board of Assessors of the Village of Atlantic BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Bajaj v. General AssuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
- Great American Insurance v. Matzen Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. CusterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Central Nassau Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v. GEICOAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.