Lincoln-Alliance Bank & Trust Co. v. Fisher
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Section 59 of the Civil Practice Act provides that the operation of a statute of limitations may be prevented by “ an acknowledgment or promise contained in a writing signed by the party to be charged.” In the instant case defendant-respondent is a cosigner of a promissory note which is being sued on. Pursuant to a letter of inquiry and warning that respondent’s collateral *466would be sold and an action brought for any balance due on the note, respondent wrote plaintiff the following letter: “Received your letter this morning and very sorry the condition of things both for yourself and myself.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Manchester v. . BraednerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. WeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lew Morris Demolition Co. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Downey v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Brill v. BrandtNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Skaneateles Savings Bank v. Modi AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Estate of EwaldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.