Legal Opinion

Lincoln-Alliance Bank & Trust Co. v. Fisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 1936PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Section 59 of the Civil Practice Act provides that the operation of a statute of limitations may be prevented by “ an acknowledgment or promise contained in a writing signed by the party to be charged.” In the instant case defendant-respondent is a cosigner of a promissory note which is being sued on. Pursuant to a letter of inquiry and warning that respondent’s collateral *466would be sold and an action brought for any balance due on the note, respondent wrote plaintiff the following letter: “Received your letter this morning and very sorry the condition of things both for yourself and myself.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manchester v. . BraednerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. WeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lew Morris Demolition Co. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Downey v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Brill v. BrandtNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Skaneateles Savings Bank v. Modi AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re the Estate of EwaldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API