Legal Opinion

Kannianen v. White

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2010No. 20090368PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Carl Kannianen appealed from a district court order requiring him and June White to execute quit claim deeds conveying one-half of their interests in certain mineral rights to each other. We affirm, concluding that the parties’ prior divorce judgment unambiguously required them to convey a one-half interest in all of their mineral rights, including individually held mineral rights, to each other.

I

[¶ 2] Kannianen and White married in 1979. In 1981, Kannianen’s mother deeded to him certain mineral interests in his name only. During the course of the marriage,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Silbernagel v. SilbernagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Serr v. SerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schulte v. KramerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. James v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Leverson v. LeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Smestad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Helbling v. HelblingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API