Kannianen v. White
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Carl Kannianen appealed from a district court order requiring him and June White to execute quit claim deeds conveying one-half of their interests in certain mineral rights to each other. We affirm, concluding that the parties’ prior divorce judgment unambiguously required them to convey a one-half interest in all of their mineral rights, including individually held mineral rights, to each other.
I
[¶ 2] Kannianen and White married in 1979. In 1981, Kannianen’s mother deeded to him certain mineral interests in his name only. During the course of the marriage,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Silbernagel v. SilbernagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Serr v. SerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schulte v. KramerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- James v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Leverson v. LeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Smestad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Helbling v. HelblingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.