Legal Opinion
United States v. Lei Shi
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided September 16, 2005No. CRIM 02-00116HGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANT LEI SHI
GILLMOR, District Judge.
Before the Court is the question of whether this Court has jurisdiction over Defendant Lei Shi, a Chinese national, who is charged in an Indictment filed on April 4, 2002, with seizing and exercising control over a covered ship 1 , the Full Means No. 2, by force and through acts of violence including the killing of the captain and first mate.
On November 13, 2002, this Court ordered the parties to address in writing the question of jurisdiction. The United States responded on January 10, 2003 and Defendant responded on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Muin Mustafa v. Clark County School District, Edward Goldman, and Daniel HusseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Rezaq, Omar MohammedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Lui Kin-Hong, A/K/A Jerry LuiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Lei ShiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ShiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008