Legal Opinion

Cremer v. Wimmer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a j udgment of the municipal court of St. Paul.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action for damages for the non-performance of a contract for the sale of land. Taking the complaint and reply together, and waiving a discrepancy in dates not here important, they show the following facts: Defendant Joseph Wimmer employed plaintiff as his agent to sell the land in question, agreeing to pay him as commission, in case he found a purchaser, all that was obtained by plaintiff over $900. Plaintiff found a purchaser, one Engel, at $1,000, and so reported to defendants, who thereupon executed to him a contract, by which they sold and agreed to convey to plaintiff personally for…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Close v. HodgesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Goodfellow v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Wilson v. GeissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Allen v. ChatfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Lundberg v. Northwestern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API