Legal Opinion

Clincy v. Pollard

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 28, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01092Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN KENYATTA SOBEASR CLINCY, Petitioner, Case No. 18-CV-1092-JPS v. WILLIAM J. POLLARD, ORDER Respondent. Petitioner Kenyatta Sobeasr Clincy (“Clincy”) filed a habeas petition pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

in this Court. (Docket #1). The Court screened the petition and determined that it was untimely by 52 days. (Docket #7 at 7). Clincy did not offer any explanation for the delay; however, the Court determined that before it could dismiss the petition, it must afford the parties an opportunity to brief whether either exception to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Thomas Socha v. Gary BoughtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Gladney v. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API