Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 28, 1990No. Docket No. 4566-86Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

LYLE CURTIS AND NANCY ELAINE HEDGES, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Curtis v. Commissioner

Docket No. 4566-86

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1990-465; 1990 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 510; 60 T.C.M. (CCH) 624; T.C.M. (RIA) 90465;

August 28, 1990, Filed

Lyle Curtis and Nancy Elaine Hedges, pro se.

Steven K. Dick and Terry L. Zabel, for the respondent.

PARR, Judge.

PARR

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

Respondent determined a $ 4,470 deficiency in petitioners' joint individual Federal income tax for calendar year ending December 31, 1982. The deficiency resulted from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Jacklin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  5. Espinoza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API