Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 12, 1967No. 44,772PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This is a quo warranto action to oust the defendant Floyd Schroeder from the office of county commissioner of Sedgwick county, third district. It was instituted pursuant to K. S. A. 60-1205, et seq., which provide for the forfeiture of a public official’s office for willful misconduct in office, willful neglect to perform any duty imposed by law, or violation of any penal statute involving moral turpitude.

The petition, as amended, alleged six separate claims for relief as grounds for removal: (1) Conflict of interest sales of material to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kerby v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. State Ex Rel. Ralston v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Weston v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Boynton v. BuchananSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. State ex rel. Beck v. HarveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. In Re Inquiry Relating to RomeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. State v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Madsen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API