Mussman v. Kootenai County
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
J. JONES, Justice.
Kootenai County appeals the Industrial Commission’s determination that Mark Mussman was not terminated for employment-related misconduct and is eligible for unemployment benefits. We affirm.
I
Factual and Procedural History
Mark Mussman worked as a planner in the Kootenai County Planning and Zoning Department until his discharge in 2008. During his employment with the County, Mussman received corrective action which required that he “[r]eview interpretations and policy decisions with the director and legal counsel before implementation.” Muss-man received this disciplinary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beaty v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Harris v. Electrical WholesaleIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Wulff v. Sun Valley Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Hagler v. Micron Technology, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Quinn v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fonseca v. Corral Agriculture, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Rigoli v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Hopkins v. PNEUMOTECH, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012