Legal Opinion

Mussman v. Kootenai County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2010No. 36693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

Kootenai County appeals the Industrial Commission’s determination that Mark Mussman was not terminated for employment-related misconduct and is eligible for unemployment benefits. We affirm.

I

Factual and Procedural History

Mark Mussman worked as a planner in the Kootenai County Planning and Zoning Department until his discharge in 2008. During his employment with the County, Mussman received corrective action which required that he “[r]eview interpretations and policy decisions with the director and legal counsel before implementation.” Muss-man received this disciplinary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Beaty v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Harris v. Electrical WholesaleIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wulff v. Sun Valley Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hagler v. Micron Technology, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Quinn v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fonseca v. Corral Agriculture, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Rigoli v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hopkins v. PNEUMOTECH, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API