Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSearl, J.
Defendant moves for judgment dismissing the respective complaints on the ground that the causes of action, alleged therein, did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon.
Briefly, the alleged causes of action, as disclosed by the moving and answering affidavits, arose out of the following facts:
The defendant, on the 17th day of July, 1936, entered into a contract with the State of New York for the excavation of the Barge canal, from Lock 2 in the city of Fulton, N. Y., to Lock 5 in the village of Minetto, N. Y. In carrying out its work, between…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Rich v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Busch v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buyers v. Buffalo Paint & Specialties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Henderson v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1950