Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Hill
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 27, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Seven applicants seek leave to intervene in this action, as parties plaintiff, and as part of their prayer for relief ask that the court set aside a decree of this court. dated July 13, 1933, which vacated an injunction pendente lite and dismissed this action without costs. The applicants all allege that they are stockholders of the defendant, The American Tobacco Company, and that they should be admitted as parties plaintiff on the ground that the action was dismissed as a result of a fraud on the court, to which the plaintiff Rogers, also a stockholder, is alleged to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- McCrone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Hirshfeld v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oppenlander v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1974
- Winkelman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- In Re King Resources Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1976
- Lurie v. Canadian Javelin LimitedIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Winkelman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.