Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Rubin

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 12, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00482Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MATTHEW JENSEN, Plaintiff, No. 3:21-cv-482 (SRU) v. MARLENE RUBIN, et al., Defendants. OMNIBUS RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS Matthew Jensen, proceeding pro se, alleges that the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) wrongfully determined that he had been overpaid benefits, then wrongfully recouped the overpayment via deductions from his benefits. He believes that the SSA and banks facilitating the recoupment deductions forged paperwork to indicate that he had been overpaid. Legally, I construe his complaint to allege that the SSA wrongfully…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API