Legal Opinion

Defer v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1887PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Case. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChakplin, J.

The only question in this ease arises upon a general demurrer to a declaration of 'which, the following is a copy:

“ And for that, whereas, the said plaintiffs heretofore, to wit, for the space of three years last past, and at the time of the injuries herein complained of, were and still are the owners of a valuable leasehold interest in certain premises in the city of Detroit, known and described as lot 3 of the subdivision of the Dequindre farm, and known as number 312 Franklin street east, in said city, aod which premises consisted of a two-story frame building, and cellar underneath the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashley v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. City of Detroit v. BeckmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Dermont v. MayorMichigan Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Giaconi v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Herro v. Chippewa County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. O'Leary v. Board of Fire & Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Seaman v. City of MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API