Legal Opinion

Borden v. Hirsh

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is a suit in equity by the lessee of two apartments, in Boston, in an indenture of lease beginning May 2, 1920, for a term of five years, with the right of renewal for ten additional years, to compel the owner (her lessor) to install in them within such time as the court may fix a system of automatic sprinklers and fire protection devices approved as to situation, arrangement and efficiency by the building commissioner of the city of Boston, in compliance with an order of said building commissioner made under St. 1907, c. 550, § 45, as amended by St. 1914, c. 782, *208§ 10, Spec. St. 1915,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cutter v. HamlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Cowen v. SunderlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Taylor v. FinniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Minor v. SharonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Gaston v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Garland v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Ryan v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Kanes v. KoutrasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Rubin v. PrescottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Condon v. WinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API