Legal Opinion
Arnold v. United States Department of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 25, 2000No. 99-10753PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Joel Arnold (“Arnold”) and Allen McDaniel (“McDaniel”) appeal the district court’s ruling as a matter of law that neither of them was entitled to compensatory damages on their claims for gender discrimination brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5. They also complain that the trial court erred when it granted the United States Department of the Interior’s (“DOI”) motion for summary judgment on their retaliation claim. We affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Arnold and McDaniel, along with Bobby Maxwell (“Maxwell”), ah worked in the Dallas Compliance…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Willard Rushing and Patricia Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Messer v. MenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Teague v. City of Flower MoundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Hall v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mota v. University of Texas Houston Health Science CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Lois Davis v. Fort Bend CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Pratt v. City of Houston TXCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Jill Brown v. Bryan County, OkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Dantana TanksleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.